Workflow in scope
One customer-facing AI path from login and data access through the most consequential action or answer.
48-hour launch review for B2B SaaS
Know what needs fixing before you launch.
AI features can improve a product quickly, but weak permissions, retrieval, state, and release evidence make customer trust difficult to scale. $750 to $1,500 in 48 hours: plain-English readiness report, severity ranking, and a prioritised fix list before real users hit broken paths.
A useful AI feature with evidence behind the release decision · $750 to $1,500 · 48-hour turnaround
Direct answer
B2B SaaS · Ship with Confidence Review
What does this engagement mean for SaaS teams?
A B2B SaaS readiness review should connect application security with AI-specific failure paths: tenant isolation, secret handling, prompt injection, data leakage, tool permissions, and release configuration. The output should tell the team what blocks launch and what can wait.
Likely system boundaries
- Authentication, roles, and tenant boundaries
- AI provider, retrieval, and tool integrations
- Deployment settings, webhooks, logs, and billing paths
Evidence required
- Customer data cannot cross tenants or environments
- Secrets and sensitive prompts do not leak through logs or errors
- Tool actions and fallback states are testable and reversible
Important boundary
The review covers the agreed release surface. It is not a penetration test, compliance certification, or full product security audit.
Who this is for
For B2B SaaS founders who moved fast with AI tools and need a straight answer before they ship.
Built for solo founders, non-technical founders, and early-stage teams with consumer apps, micro-SaaS, or marketing-led products. You do not need a technical background. You need a clear list of what will actually break in the next week-before real users, investors, or your own reputation are on the line.
- You shipped an app with Cursor, Bolt, Claude Code, Lovable, or similar tools.
- You are not sure whether your flows, integrations, or deployment config will hold up with real users.
- The happy path works, but edge cases, empty states, and error handling were never really tested.
- You want a clear written report, not a vague “you should hire a developer someday.”
What we look for
The failure patterns that show up when AI builds the first version.
Broken flows, missing states, and error conditions that will surface with real users on day one
Missing validation, silent failures, and edge cases the AI left unhandled
API integrations and third-party services that are connected but not correctly configured
N+1 queries, missing indexes, and unoptimised payloads that will visibly degrade under real traffic
Environment variables, build settings, and hosting config gaps that cause prod-vs-dev divergence
Gaps between the happy path and what actually happens: loading states, empty states, and error handling
What you receive
A report you can act on this week.
The review is priced between $750 to $1,500 based on codebase size, number of integrations, and complexity. Delivered in 48 hours from access. If you want the issues fixed after the report, remediation is available at $120/hr with a clear priority order.
Plain-English readiness report
Each finding explained in terms of real-world consequence: what a real user would experience, not a stack trace.
Severity ranking
Launch Blocker / High / Medium / Low, based on actual likelihood and user impact, not raw tool output.
Prioritised fix list
Ordered by impact, with the smallest number of changes that make the biggest difference to launch confidence.
Walkthrough call
15 to 20 minute call to walk through findings and answer “what do I fix first”, not an open-ended support line.
Out of Scope
Penetration testing, compliance certification (SOC 2 / HIPAA / PCI-DSS / ISO), prompt-injection or LLM red-teaming, ongoing monitoring, or a guarantee of zero vulnerabilities.
Frequently Asked Questions