How much is this actually going to cost me?

$750 to $1,500, flat, decided before we start, not after three discovery calls. You will know the exact number before you share repo access. If you want the issues fixed afterward, we can scope a separate fix block from the report. If you would rather hand the report to your own developer, that is fine too.

What if you look and there is nothing wrong?

You get a clear written report of what was checked, what was found, and what still needs evidence. The review does not promise a clean system, zero vulnerabilities, or a substitute for specialist security testing. It gives you a practical launch decision and a prioritised next step.

Why not just ask a freelancer on Upwork to look at it?

You can. What you are paying for here is a bounded review with a fixed deliverable: a specific list of what needs attention, ranked by what to fix first, delivered in 48 hours, from someone who also builds the production systems these failures show up in.

48-hour launch review

Know what needs fixing before you launch.

A 48-hour, plain-English launch decision for an AI-assisted app—with critical paths checked, findings ranked by severity, and the fix order made clear.

Scope the launch review Compare offers

$750 to $1,500 · Written report · 48-hour turnaround · Optional scoped fix block

Representative findings report

Launch readiness summary

Conditional go

Critical paths

03 exercised

Priority finding

Failure behavior needs a clear user-facing state before launch.

01Critical user flows exercised
02Service configuration checked
03Fix order ranked by impact

Representative preview - findings come from the product you share

Who this is for

For founders who moved fast with AI tools and need a straight answer before they ship.

Built for solo founders, non-technical founders, and early-stage teams with consumer apps, micro-SaaS, or marketing-led products. You do not need a technical background. You need a clear list of what will actually break in the next week-before real users, investors, or your own reputation are on the line.

You shipped an app with Cursor, Bolt, Claude Code, Lovable, or similar tools.
You are not sure whether your flows, integrations, or deployment config will hold up with real users.
The happy path works, but edge cases, empty states, and error handling were never really tested.
You want a clear written report-not a vague “you should hire a developer someday.”

What we look for

The failure patterns that show up when AI builds the first version.

Broken flows, missing states, and error conditions that will surface with real users on day one
Missing validation, silent failures, and edge cases the AI left unhandled
API integrations and third-party services that are connected but not correctly configured
N+1 queries, missing indexes, and unoptimised payloads that will visibly degrade under real traffic
Environment variables, build settings, and hosting config gaps that cause prod-vs-dev divergence
Gaps between the happy path and what actually happens-loading states, empty states, error handling

Representative findings record

Launch issue register

Action needed

Priority finding

A failed integration needs a visible state and a recovery path before users depend on it.

Severity: High - blocks a reliable launch
Consequence: A user cannot complete the intended action
Next action: Assign an owner and verify the fix

Representative preview - priorities are based on the product and paths reviewed

What you receive

A report you can act on this week.

The review is priced between $750 to $1,500 based on codebase size, number of integrations, and complexity. Delivered in 48 hours from access. If you want the issues fixed after the report, we can scope a separate fix block with a clear priority order. You can also hand the report to your own developer.

Plain-English readiness report

Each finding explained in terms of real-world consequence-what a real user would experience, not a stack trace.

Severity ranking

Launch Blocker / High / Medium / Low, based on actual likelihood and user impact, not raw tool output.

Prioritised fix list

Ordered by impact, with the smallest number of changes that make the biggest difference to launch confidence.

Walkthrough call

15–20 minute call to walk through findings and answer “what do I fix first”-not an open-ended support line.

Out of Scope

Penetration testing, compliance certification (SOC 2 / HIPAA / PCI-DSS / ISO), prompt-injection or LLM red-teaming, ongoing monitoring, or a guarantee of zero vulnerabilities.

Industry applications