Make your logistics AI safe enough to launch.

Logistics AI reliability depends on testing delayed scans, missing events, duplicate webhooks, conflicting carrier updates, and unavailable downstream systems. The release decision should show when the workflow proceeds, asks for clarification, or hands the exception to an operator.

Yes. The review identifies the bugs, architecture gaps, deployment issues, monitoring gaps, and edge cases that could block a trustworthy release. Implementation is separately scoped.

Yes. It checks identity, authorization, tenant boundaries, RLS where relevant, secrets, sensitive data exposure, API abuse, and prompt or context manipulation when AI behavior is in scope. It is a bounded readiness review, not a penetration test.

Yes. A senior engineer traces the relevant code and configuration, then validates behavior against evidence, including hidden logic defects, unsafe migrations, weak permissions, retry failures, and duplicate actions.

Yes. We inspect existing tests, pull-request checks, CI/CD, staging, monitoring, deployment, and rollback controls that affect the reviewed journey. We do not implement every gap in the review fee.

Yes. APIs, webhooks, payments, CRM and automation workflows, document processing, agents, media pipelines, queues, retries, and recovery are checked when the critical journey depends on them.

Yes. The review is platform-agnostic and can inspect apps built with Lovable, Replit, Base44, Cursor, Claude Code, Codex, v0, Bolt, WordPress, or similar tools. Migration planning or implementation is separately scoped.

Yes, where it affects the reviewed journey. We check architecture, database design, reusable components, documentation, discoverability, platform lock-in, ownership, and the next developer's ability to make a safe change.

Yes, when they affect the launch journey. We check responsive behavior, loading, empty and error states, accessibility, SEO-critical surfaces, and launch-impacting product polish. A full redesign is outside scope.

AI Reliability Sprint is $4,500 for one defined workflow, with an optional $1,500 per month retainer. The final scope depends on the defined workflow, system access, evidence required, and agreed handover.

Missing or stale scans do not become confident false updates Duplicate events are idempotent High-impact exceptions escalate with a clear owner and recovery path The engagement should end with an explicit handover and a clear list of remaining risks, not a general claim that the AI is safe.

The sprint produces evidence for one release decision. It does not replace service-level agreements, carrier governance, or operational continuity planning.